Polymarket seeks help against New York in prediction markets dispute
Polymarket’s request for help against New York and Kalshi’s potential tribal agreement concern prediction market operators.
Coverage since 17 August 2026. Open in the feed
Get it flagged in Friday’s five whenever it moves.
USD 645,175
Computed from The Weekly Edge graph and entries. No model-generated numbers.
Activity summary: Kalshi appears in 173 entries across 4 markets (mainly USA, Taiwan, Norway). By desk: Regulation 111, Deals & M&A 34, Enforcement & compliance 23, Licences & markets 3, People moves 2. Computed from our records only.
None recorded.
Typed links extracted from our entries: fines, licences, deals, tenders, appointments and partnerships.
Kalshi and the entities it is linked to. Drag to explore; click a node to open its page.
Loading network…
Newest first, grouped by month.
Polymarket’s request for help against New York and Kalshi’s potential tribal agreement concern prediction market operators.
The access restrictions affect how prediction-market platforms can serve users in Taiwan amid enforcement over election-related betting.
The dispute concerns whether states can apply gambling rules to sports-event contracts offered by federally regulated exchanges.
Kalshi’s expanded NFL offering gives traders partial payouts when selected player statistics fall below contract targets.
The findings bear on state challenges to Kalshi and Polymarket's position that their contracts fall exclusively under CFTC jurisdiction.
The outcome could determine whether prediction market operators can continue serving the US market under federal or state rules.
Nevada has no fallback plan if the Supreme Court sides with prediction market operators, leaving its stance uncertain.
The suit contests state authority over Underdog’s prediction market and follows a ruling against Kalshi.
Investors assessing election betting growth must consider that Polymarket’s busiest 1% of wallets generated 70% of congressional trading volume.
Kalshi’s proposed rule would allow financial penalties, suspension or account deactivation for users harassing athletes or third parties over trading.
The comments raise licensing and tribal-law questions for prediction-market operators and tribes considering agreements with them.
Kalshi retains preliminary protection from Illinois gambling enforcement, while wager-related fees remain subject to further briefing.
BetMGM's iGaming revenue exceeded its online sports betting revenue, giving investors a comparison of the operator's two businesses.
Kalshi’s investigation subjects trades preceding a public appointment to scrutiny over possible advance knowledge.
Ohio’s request puts disputed state and federal authority over sports prediction market operators before the Supreme Court.
Sports trading helped prediction market operators exceed their previous monthly volume record.
Kalshi’s sports contract share and DraftKings’ app download share give investors measures of prediction market competition.
Coinbase must suspend Michigan prediction markets while Michigan withholds enforcement during compliance and related appeals.
The reported public view and opposition to several types of betting inform the debate over prediction market oversight.
The poll gives investors divided expectations for DraftKings and Flutter, including adaptation, displacement and consolidation with prediction markets.
The measures could affect how operators and prediction-market exchanges are regulated at federal and state level.
The partnerships create commercial opportunities for tribal operators while legal disputes over sports event contracts remain unresolved.
Operators could face separate state disputes over sports event contracts if Supreme Court review leaves conflicting appeals decisions unresolved.
The case could determine whether prediction markets must meet state gambling requirements when competing with licensed sportsbooks.
ARK Invest’s purchase backs Kalshi’s US prediction market business through three actively managed ETFs.
The proposal would restrict election contract trading by federal candidates, specified family members and campaign committees, backed by civil penalties.
The dispute concerns whether federal commodities regulators or gambling authorities should oversee sports contracts, affecting prediction market oversight.
The partnerships give the tribes customer-facing apps while Kalshi operates the underlying exchange and settles transactions.
The case and lawsuit could affect how sports event contracts operate and how Florida’s gaming compact applies to DraftKings’ platform.
Kalshi’s tribal partnerships and FanDuel’s continuing shift away from CME mark changes in their business relationships.
Conflicting state rulings underpin calls for Supreme Court intervention in New Jersey’s prediction-market appeal involving Kalshi.
The NFL seeks gambling classification for prediction-market apps, citing sporting integrity concerns, unclear rules and limited sports wagering oversight.
The possible blocks would restrict access to the targeted websites for users in Norway.
The case could affect whether states can regulate sports prediction markets and the safeguards operators face.
Prediction market regulation faces scrutiny through 39 states’ Supreme Court filing and the NFL’s call for clarity.
Four additional tribal agreements give tribes app ownership and customer management while Kalshi supplies exchange services.
The dispute concerns whether sports prediction platforms must comply with state gambling laws alongside federal financial supervision.
Nevada’s proposed regulatory amendment would remove references to the National Council on Problem Gambling.
The NFL’s Supreme Court brief supports treating sports event contracts as gambling subject to state gambling laws.
Coinbase’s withdrawal follows Michigan enforcement against sports event contracts that regulators consider unauthorised sports betting.
Four tribes’ planned Kalshi apps could extend prediction markets to smaller, remote communities, according to Kalshi.
The case could determine whether states can apply gambling laws to prediction market operators such as Kalshi and Polymarket.
Accepting New Jersey’s appeal would enable Supreme Court review of prediction market oversight without resolving the merits.
Operators offering these products in Utah face an explicit legal warning, while Kalshi contests the state's authority through its federal appeal.
IAGR and NAGRA’s joint brief adds regulatory backing to New Jersey’s request for Supreme Court review.
Reported wash trading estimates and sports betting concentration put prediction platforms’ trading integrity and younger users under scrutiny.
Investors can compare HIP-4’s early October daily volume of roughly $1.25m with higher volumes at Kalshi and Polymarket.
Federal candidates would face financial penalties for trading prediction market contracts on their own elections under the proposed legislation.
Utah’s effort to apply gambling prohibitions puts prediction market operators in conflict with the administration’s position on their classification.
Kalshi’s injunction prevents Illinois from imposing prediction market rules while questions over proposed wagering fees and taxes remain.
The injunctions give Kalshi and the CFTC interim judicial relief against Illinois.
The Illinois finding supports Kalshi’s sports contracts qualifying as swaps as Ohio regulators pursue separate enforcement against prediction markets.
Prediction market operators could face the gambling tax treatment applied to conventional sportsbooks if authorities adopt the analysis’s interpretation.
Ohio will enforce gambling laws against Kalshi after the court rejected its federal commodities law defence.
JPMorgan’s estimate gives investors potential additional EBITDA from Genius Sports’ agreements with Kalshi and Polymarket.
Sports and combo markets generated 86% of Sunday volume, highlighting their importance to prediction market operators.
Polymarket and Kalshi face unresolved oversight questions as experts warn stock-linked contracts could affect share trading and complicate enforcement.
Heather Maurer’s departure changes NCPG leadership following the organisation’s announcement of a $2m partnership with Kalshi.
The dispute pits state gambling enforcement against the CFTC’s claim of exclusive jurisdiction over sports-event contracts.
Tribal leaders and the AGA are coordinating against prediction markets as a California coalition prepares for possible sports betting changes.
The lobbying seeks to influence the regulatory treatment of prediction market products in the USA.
Operators face differing competitive positions: Polymarket leads branded searches, while Kalshi leads trading volume and narrows the search gap.
Kalshi faces application of Ohio and Tennessee sports betting laws following the Sixth Circuit's ruling against it.
NCPG must replace its executive director while managing member departures linked to its Kalshi partnership.
The decision supports Ohio and Tennessee’s efforts to apply state oversight to sports prediction market apps.
Tennessee’s enforcement injunction was removed, while Ohio’s denial of similar protection leaves Kalshi subject to state gambling laws.
Kalshi restricted prediction market access on three California tribal reservations after an appeals court found likely tribal gaming law breaches.
The dispute brings Polymarket into New York’s legal battle over prediction markets.
Conflicting appeals court positions leave prediction market operators facing disagreement over whether sports event contracts constitute bets.
Investors face contrasting casino transaction outcomes as an MGM takeover collapsed while the Caesars deal progressed.
Kalshi faces continued legal challenges after an appeals court backed tribes’ preliminary injunction and found their claims likely to succeed.
Kalshi and Polymarket face a requested Senate examination of whether presidential family connections enabled financial gain or privileged access.
The federation seeks court orders that would restrict how Kalshi identifies Liga MX event contracts.
Prediction market exchanges face a CFTC warning about manipulation risks involving public figures’ statements or actions.
The disparity between Ethereum turnover and open interest raises questions for investors assessing Kalshi’s reported trading activity.
The launch gives a Tribal-owned business access to Kalshi’s exchange while other Tribal governments challenge sports-event contracts in court.
Texas legislators heard calls for litigation against prediction markets alongside Kalshi’s warnings about offshore alternatives.
Prediction market operators face demands to comply with Missouri gambling rules and pay gambling taxes, with litigation possible if they refuse.
The Kalshi partnership prompted Ohio’s regulator to end its NCPG relationship and drew opposition from Michigan and Nevada regulators.
Stork’s Kalshi agreement supplies institutional trading firms with live and historical prediction-market data for research, market making and arbitrage.
CNBC linked growing interest in Polymarket and Kalshi to football’s return and the approaching November election.
The Indian Gaming Association seeks explicit safeguards against federal commodities law overriding state and tribal gaming laws.
Sportsbooks compete with prediction markets for customers and advertising placements, according to Intelitics chief executive Allan Stone.
The ruling subjects disputed Nevada sports event contracts to gambling rules, while DraftKings and Flutter shares gained.
Operators face unresolved gaming definitions as the CFTC deliberates and Nevada and New Jersey assert authority over sports-outcome contracts.
Polymarket and Kalshi’s European expansion accompanies ESMA calls for monitoring insider trading, manipulation and potential retail harm.
Coinbase’s selected platform automates contract creation, resolution, settlement and reporting for Kalshi prediction-market products.
The Massachusetts Gaming Commission maintains its NCPG relationship despite concerns about Kalshi’s organisational membership.
Pennsylvania proposals would introduce prediction-market taxation, PGCB oversight, insider-trading bans and restrictions on bets involving deaths and youth sport.
The Senate hearing gives Texas lawmakers an opportunity to examine prediction market oversight and youth access.
DICE gives investors ETF exposure to prediction market businesses, including private holdings in Kalshi and Polymarket.
MGC retains its National Council on Problem Gambling membership while leaving commissioners scope to revisit it at renewal.
ESMA’s report highlights blurred boundaries between financial instruments, prediction markets and gambling, explicitly naming Polymarket and Kalshi.
The ruling leaves Iowa able to apply gambling laws to Kalshi as regulators allege unauthorised sporting outcome markets.
The bill seeks to remove Illinois’s prediction market tax, whose application Kalshi and the CFTC challenged in court.
The ruling leaves Kalshi exposed to Utah gambling enforcement while its appeal continues.
State officials are examining gambling laws as grounds to regulate or prohibit operators’ election prediction contracts.
Kalshi failed to secure preliminary protection against Iowa gambling enforcement targeting its sports event contracts.
Kalshi’s injunction rejection rests on the judge finding express federal pre-emption of Iowa law unlikely for sports event contracts.
Prediction market platforms face proposed election trading safeguards while court disputes continue over states’ gambling regulatory authority.
Robinhood’s sports event contracts remain withdrawn from Michigan at least until the Sixth Circuit rules on related appeals.
Kalshi remains subject to Utah gambling law enforcement while appealing its District Court defeat.
Any UK legalisation could require prediction market operators to obtain gambling licences and comply with UKGC rules.
The partnership gives Kalshi exclusive official live streams and data rights for US prediction markets under a multi-year agreement.
The NFL is seeking removal of certain betting products from prediction platforms, including Kalshi and Polymarket.
Kalshi faces a Michigan sports contract ban and geoblocking order, alongside an adverse Ninth Circuit ruling.
The Illinois repeal proposal would remove the sports prediction market transaction tax challenged by Kalshi and the CFTC.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton remains outside states’ campaign against prediction markets despite his previous opposition to gambling.
The petition challenges a ruling favouring Kalshi over New Jersey’s authority to regulate its sports contracts as gambling.
DraftKings and FanDuel compete with Kalshi for US sports bettors as Kalshi avoids describing its product as a bet.
FanDuel and DraftKings face competition from Kalshi and Polymarket for sports betting customers as the NFL season approaches.
The preliminary injunction requires Kalshi to restrict Michigan users’ access to sports contracts.
The unanimous ruling subjects Kalshi’s sports markets to state sports betting laws, although Roth identified aspects potentially supporting Kalshi.
New York’s attorney general’s office challenges the CFTC’s emergency order as promoting Kalshi’s interests in nationwide litigation.
Kalshi must exclude Michigan customers and faces daily financial penalties if it fails to comply with the court's geolocation requirements.
Prediction market providers face scrutiny as Missouri’s attorney general seeks sportsbook taxation and regulation for sports prediction markets.
The petition seeks Supreme Court review of the dispute over state regulation of Kalshi’s sports contracts.
The case could determine whether operators offering sports event contracts must comply with state gambling licensing and tax requirements.
The preliminary injunction bars Kalshi from providing sports betting contracts to people in Michigan.
New Jersey seeks clarity on whether federal event contract oversight blocks state gambling enforcement.
Kalshi expects clarifying rules and league agreements that its chief executive believes could help navigate legal uncertainty.
Kalshi’s fine and three-year ban demonstrate enforcement of rules against candidates betting on their own elections.
Kalshi’s first permanent exclusion demonstrates its enforcement response to alleged manipulation of political prediction contracts.
Kalshi’s lifetime ban of Santos demonstrates participant exclusion as a disciplinary response to market manipulation.
Santos has lost access to Kalshi and his paid relationship with Polymarket.
Kalshi’s disciplinary cases address candidates buying contracts linked to themselves and alleged market manipulation.
The ruling classifies Kalshi’s sports contracts as bets rather than swaps protected under federal law.
Kalshi imposed a permanent ban and financial penalty over alleged manipulation involving Santos’s trading and public attendance statements.
Kalshi’s enforcement action addresses political candidates betting on their own electoral victory.
Kalshi’s exclusive partnership bars competing prediction market advertising at US Open venues and during television coverage.
The ruling backs Nevada’s action against Kalshi’s sports contracts after Kalshi failed to demonstrate likely federal pre-emption.
The ruling strengthens state regulators’ position in disputes over whether prediction platforms must comply with gambling rules.
The ruling permits Nevada to apply its gaming laws to Kalshi’s operations in the state.
Kalshi permanently barred Santos after concluding he likely profited from insider trading on wagers concerning his own attendance.
The CFTC sanction combines a fine, profit surrender and a three-year trading ban for betting on presidential speech content.
Conflicting appellate rulings on Kalshi could bring the dispute before the Supreme Court.
The court ruled against Kalshi’s Nevada sports contracts while leaving federal pre-emption unresolved for election contracts.
Nevada can enforce gambling laws against Kalshi’s sports event contracts following rejection of its federal pre-emption argument.
Kalshi’s review found no evidence that Prakash traded on races covered by the fabricated election polls he circulated.
The ruling allows Nevada regulators to act against Kalshi’s prediction market operations despite its federal commodities law argument.
Users aged 18–21 traded approximately $3.9bn in sports contracts and parlays as leagues sought a minimum trading age of 21.
Kalshi faced further legal disputes in Connecticut and Montana as the sector added entrants, data partnerships and distribution agreements.
The criticism puts the CFTC’s response to court orders under scrutiny from gaming attorneys.
Connecticut’s lawsuit seeks to halt Kalshi’s sports contracts and impose penalties and repayment of revenue generated in the state.
Connecticut seeks to stop Kalshi’s alleged unlicensed sports wagering, while Kalshi asserts exclusive CFTC jurisdiction and appeals an enforcement ruling.
Connecticut seeks an immediate injunction halting Kalshi’s sports-event contracts, alleging sports betting without state authorisation.
US casino operators are investing in dining, concerts and other attractions to draw Gen Z visitors.
The CFTC’s instruction leaves Kalshi facing conflicting agency and court directions over continued trading in New York.
Kalshi’s sponsorships expand MLB prediction market partnerships, with four new partners playing in states that prohibit sports betting.
The agreements give Kalshi advertising exposure and fan engagement opportunities across five MLB teams.
Potentially conflicting appeals rulings could bring the CFTC-state dispute over event contract oversight before the Supreme Court, according to Pidot.
Kalshi’s team partnerships and DraftKings’ Predictions advertising extend their California presence where sports betting remains illegal.
Kalshi’s partnerships with the Dodgers and four other MLB teams expand prediction market operators’ commercial relationships with clubs.
DraftKings joins Kalshi and Polymarket in California’s prediction market sector, where traditional sports betting remains illegal.
Kalshi is lobbying to maintain California platform access as DraftKings goes live in the state.
The dispute concerns states’ authority to oversee and tax prediction market operators’ activities.
The committee examined manipulation risks, while disputed examples highlight disagreement over which products breached standards.
Nevada challenges whether Kalshi’s support for state taxation alongside federal oversight strengthens its preemption case.
Nevada uses Kalshi’s acceptance of North Carolina’s revenue tax to argue that states have authority over prediction markets.
Nevada argues Kalshi’s acceptance of North Carolina’s trading revenue tax acknowledges state regulatory power and supports Nevada taxation.
The court-linked sports shutdown limits Kalshi’s market offering in Washington State.
Operators seeking relief from state enforcement face federal appeals proceedings as the CFTC moves towards new sector rules.
Operators face competing federal and state jurisdiction claims, alongside New York’s allegations against Kalshi over gambling and tax avoidance.
Kalshi’s bans and fines demonstrate enforcement against congressional candidates over alleged wagers involving their own candidacies.
Federal backing for permitted operators and insufficient congressional support underpin a lawyer’s assessment that states would gain no midterm advantage.
Novig’s reported $128m opening-week trading volume gives investors a launch benchmark against its claimed comparison with Kalshi.
The planned White House meeting connects prediction market executives with President Trump and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission chairman.
Prediction market operators face calls for New York taxation alongside litigation over states’ allegations that they operate illegal sportsbooks.
ParlayX’s planned prediction market platform centres on combination bets, following its original intention to concentrate on parlays.
Kalshi faces a requested daily fine over alleged failure to geofence certain event contracts in Nevada.
Operators face proposed Pennsylvania prediction market regulation that would require neither taxes nor licences while permitting sports event contracts.
Kalshi faces potential daily fines as Nevada disputes compliance with the court-imposed geofencing deadline.
Kalshi remains without its requested emergency injunction during appeal after the judge rejected reliance on the CFTC order.